Faroe Islands vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Faroe Islands
0.0828 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
0.0742 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Faroe Islands rank
17th
Romania rank
18th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Romania
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0.0828 t per square kilometre against 0.0742 t per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.0086 t per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 17th and Romania ranks 18th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0285 t per square kilometre 0.0517 t per square kilometre 0.0232 t per square kilometre Romania
1970s 0.0621 t per square kilometre 0.0692 t per square kilometre 0.007 t per square kilometre Romania
1980s 0.0638 t per square kilometre 0.0759 t per square kilometre 0.0121 t per square kilometre Romania
1990s 0.0676 t per square kilometre 0.0751 t per square kilometre 0.0075 t per square kilometre Romania
2000s 0.0682 t per square kilometre 0.0535 t per square kilometre 0.0147 t per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.0714 t per square kilometre 0.0696 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Faroe Islands or Romania?
Faroe Islands, at 0.0828 t per square kilometre against 0.0742 t per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Faroe Islands and Romania?
0.0086 t per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Romania?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Faroe Islands and Romania rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Faroe Islands ranks 17th and Romania ranks 18th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/romania/">Faroe Islands vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.