Eswatini vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Eswatini
0.0019 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0024 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
116th
Namibia rank
113th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Namibia
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0024 t per square kilometre against 0.0019 t per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0005 t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 116th and Namibia ranks 113th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0028 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0029 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Eswatini or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0024 t per square kilometre against 0.0019 t per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Eswatini and Namibia?
0.0005 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Eswatini ranks 116th and Namibia ranks 113th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/namibia/">Eswatini vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.