Estonia vs Mauritius: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Estonia
0.0024 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Mauritius
0.0028 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
109th
Mauritius rank
106th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Estonia
  • Mauritius
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0028 t per square kilometre against 0.0024 t per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.0004 t per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 109th and Mauritius ranks 106th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0035 t per square kilometre 0.0033 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.0035 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0023 t per square kilometre 0.0011 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Estonia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0028 t per square kilometre against 0.0024 t per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Estonia and Mauritius?
0.0004 t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Estonia and Mauritius rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Estonia ranks 109th and Mauritius ranks 106th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Mauritius: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/estonia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/estonia/mauritius/">Estonia vs Mauritius: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.