Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Equatorial Guinea
0.0007 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.0005 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Equatorial Guinea rank
132nd
Latvia rank
134th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Latvia
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0007 t per square kilometre against 0.0005 t per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 134th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Equatorial Guinea or Latvia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0007 t per square kilometre against 0.0005 t per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Latvia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 134th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/latvia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Latvia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.