Equatorial Guinea vs Guyana: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Equatorial Guinea
0.0007 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
0.0006 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
132nd
Guyana rank
133rd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Guyana
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0007 t per square kilometre against 0.0006 t per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Guyana ranks 133rd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Guyana in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Guyana
1970s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Guyana
2020s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Equatorial Guinea or Guyana?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0007 t per square kilometre against 0.0006 t per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Equatorial Guinea and Guyana?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Guyana rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd and Guyana ranks 133rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Guyana: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/guyana/">Equatorial Guinea vs Guyana: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.