El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

El Salvador
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0002 t per square kilometre
in 1990
El Salvador rank
142nd
Sri Lanka rank
145th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • El Salvador
  • Sri Lanka
0000196119922023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0002 t per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.6 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

El Salvador ranks 142nd and Sri Lanka ranks 145th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, El Salvador or Sri Lanka?
El Salvador, at 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0002 t per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do El Salvador and Sri Lanka rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
El Salvador ranks 142nd and Sri Lanka ranks 145th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/sri-lanka/">El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.