Egypt vs Singapore: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Egypt
0.0069 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0066 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
83rd
Singapore rank
84th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Egypt
  • Singapore
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 0.0069 t per square kilometre against 0.0066 t per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Singapore ahead.

Egypt ranks 83rd and Singapore ranks 84th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.6031 t per square kilometre 0.5998 t per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.885 t per square kilometre 0.8817 t per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.0059 t per square kilometre 0.4835 t per square kilometre 0.4776 t per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.0081 t per square kilometre 0.1495 t per square kilometre 0.1414 t per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0102 t per square kilometre 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.0085 t per square kilometre 0.0065 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.007 t per square kilometre 0.0051 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Egypt or Singapore?
Egypt, at 0.0069 t per square kilometre against 0.0066 t per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Egypt and Singapore?
0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Singapore rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Egypt ranks 83rd and Singapore ranks 84th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Singapore: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/singapore/">Egypt vs Singapore: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.