Ecuador vs South Sudan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Ecuador
0.0038 t per square kilometre
in 2023
South Sudan
0.0041 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
100th
South Sudan rank
97th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Sudan
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 0.0041 t per square kilometre against 0.0038 t per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 97th of 160 countries.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0027 t per square kilometre 0.0055 t per square kilometre 0.0027 t per square kilometre South Sudan
2020s 0.0036 t per square kilometre 0.0042 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Ecuador or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 0.0041 t per square kilometre against 0.0038 t per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Ecuador and South Sudan?
0.0003 t per square kilometre, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Sudan?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and South Sudan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Ecuador ranks 100th and South Sudan ranks 97th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Sudan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/south-sudan/">Ecuador vs South Sudan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.