Congo vs Zambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Congo
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
144th
Zambia rank
141st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Congo
  • Zambia
0000196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 141st of 160 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Congo or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Congo and Zambia?
0 t per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Congo ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 141st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zambia/">Congo vs Zambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.