Chad vs Cuba: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Chad
0.0275 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0.0276 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
42nd
Cuba rank
41st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Chad
  • Cuba
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0276 t per square kilometre against 0.0275 t per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 42nd and Cuba ranks 41st of 160 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.004 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0032 t per square kilometre 0.0105 t per square kilometre 0.0073 t per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0069 t per square kilometre 0.0164 t per square kilometre 0.0095 t per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0148 t per square kilometre 0.0232 t per square kilometre 0.0084 t per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0246 t per square kilometre 0.0305 t per square kilometre 0.0058 t per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Chad or Cuba?
Cuba, at 0.0276 t per square kilometre against 0.0275 t per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Chad and Cuba?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Cuba rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Chad ranks 42nd and Cuba ranks 41st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Cuba: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chad/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/chad/cuba/">Chad vs Cuba: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.