Botswana vs Finland: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Botswana
0.0004 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Botswana rank
138th
Finland rank
140th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Botswana
  • Finland
000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Botswana ranks 138th and Finland ranks 140th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Botswana or Finland?
Botswana, at 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Botswana and Finland?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Finland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Botswana and Finland rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Botswana ranks 138th and Finland ranks 140th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Finland: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/botswana/finland/">Botswana vs Finland: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.