Bhutan vs Honduras: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bhutan
0.0001 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
0.0002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
149th
Honduras rank
146th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bhutan
  • Honduras
0000.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0.0001 t per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Honduras's figure about 1.5 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 149th and Honduras ranks 146th of 160 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Honduras in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bhutan or Honduras?
Honduras, at 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0.0001 t per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bhutan and Honduras?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Honduras?
33 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Honduras rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bhutan ranks 149th and Honduras ranks 146th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Honduras: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/honduras/">Bhutan vs Honduras: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.