Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Belize
0.0008 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0007 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
130th
Equatorial Guinea rank
132nd
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Belize
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Belize currently reports 0.0008 t per square kilometre against 0.0007 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.
That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Belize ranks 130th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd of 160 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0006 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
- Belize, at 0.0008 t per square kilometre against 0.0007 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Belize ranks 130th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 132nd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.