Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Belgium
0.0054 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Kazakhstan
0.0063 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
88th
Kazakhstan rank
85th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Belgium
  • Kazakhstan
0.0030.0050.0070.010.013199220072023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0063 t per square kilometre against 0.0054 t per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.0009 t per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 88th and Kazakhstan ranks 85th of 160 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Kazakhstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0051 t per square kilometre 0.0045 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.0046 t per square kilometre 0.0063 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Belgium or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0063 t per square kilometre against 0.0054 t per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Belgium and Kazakhstan?
0.0009 t per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kazakhstan?
18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Belgium and Kazakhstan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Belgium ranks 88th and Kazakhstan ranks 85th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belgium/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/belgium/kazakhstan/">Belgium vs Kazakhstan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.