Barbados vs Malta: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Barbados
0.0511 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.0458 t per square kilometre
in 2017
Barbados rank
26th
Malta rank
29th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Barbados
  • Malta
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0511 t per square kilometre against 0.0458 t per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.0053 t per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Barbados ranks 26th and Malta ranks 29th of 160 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0426 t per square kilometre 0.0812 t per square kilometre 0.0386 t per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.0684 t per square kilometre 0.0451 t per square kilometre 0.0233 t per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 0.0778 t per square kilometre 0.0098 t per square kilometre 0.068 t per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 0.0323 t per square kilometre 0.0168 t per square kilometre 0.0155 t per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 0.0412 t per square kilometre 0.04 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 0.0578 t per square kilometre 0.0429 t per square kilometre 0.0148 t per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Barbados or Malta?
Barbados, at 0.0511 t per square kilometre against 0.0458 t per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Barbados and Malta?
0.0053 t per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Barbados and Malta rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Barbados ranks 26th and Malta ranks 29th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Malta: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/barbados/malta/">Barbados vs Malta: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.