Bangladesh vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bangladesh
0.0079 t per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.008 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
81st
North Macedonia rank
80th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • North Macedonia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.008 t per square kilometre against 0.0079 t per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 81st and North Macedonia ranks 80th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0028 t per square kilometre 0.019 t per square kilometre 0.0162 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 0.0048 t per square kilometre 0.0121 t per square kilometre 0.0073 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 0.0067 t per square kilometre 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre North Macedonia
2020s 0.0077 t per square kilometre 0.0073 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bangladesh or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0.008 t per square kilometre against 0.0079 t per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bangladesh and North Macedonia?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bangladesh ranks 81st and North Macedonia ranks 80th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/north-macedonia/">Bangladesh vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.