Bahamas vs Belize: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Bahamas
0.0007 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize
0.0008 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
131st
Belize rank
130th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Bahamas
  • Belize
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0.0008 t per square kilometre against 0.0007 t per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 131st and Belize ranks 130th of 160 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Belize Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Bahamas
1970s 0.0014 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre Bahamas
1980s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre Bahamas
1990s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Bahamas or Belize?
Belize, at 0.0008 t per square kilometre against 0.0007 t per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Bahamas and Belize?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Belize?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Belize rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Bahamas ranks 131st and Belize ranks 130th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Belize: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/belize/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/belize/">Bahamas vs Belize: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.