Australia vs Gambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Australia
0.0141 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.0173 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
60th
Gambia rank
57th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Australia
  • Gambia
0.0050.0070.010.0130.0150.018196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.0173 t per square kilometre against 0.0141 t per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0032 t per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 60th and Gambia ranks 57th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Gambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0102 t per square kilometre 0.0077 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.0106 t per square kilometre 0.0094 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0091 t per square kilometre 0.012 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.0104 t per square kilometre 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0107 t per square kilometre 0.0119 t per square kilometre 0.0012 t per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 0.011 t per square kilometre 0.0096 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.012 t per square kilometre 0.0163 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Australia or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.0173 t per square kilometre against 0.0141 t per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Australia and Gambia?
0.0032 t per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Gambia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Australia ranks 60th and Gambia ranks 57th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Gambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/australia/gambia-the/">Australia vs Gambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.