Argentina vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Argentina
0.002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0024 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
115th
Namibia rank
113th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Argentina
  • Namibia
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0024 t per square kilometre against 0.002 t per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.0004 t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 113th of 160 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0087 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.0063 t per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 0.0068 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 0.005 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0028 t per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.0015 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 0.0029 t per square kilometre 0.0024 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 0.0022 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Argentina or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0024 t per square kilometre against 0.002 t per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Argentina and Namibia?
0.0004 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Argentina ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 113th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/argentina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-square-kilometre/argentina/namibia/">Argentina vs Namibia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,958 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.