Luxembourg vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Luxembourg
0 t per person
in 2017
Suriname
0 t per person
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
141st
Suriname rank
138th
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Luxembourg
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 138th of 160 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Luxembourg or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 0 t per person, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Suriname?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Luxembourg and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Luxembourg ranks 141st and Suriname ranks 138th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.