Guinea vs South Sudan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Guinea
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0002 t per person
in 2024
Guinea rank
57th
South Sudan rank
58th
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Guinea
- South Sudan
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in South Sudan, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was South Sudan ahead.
Guinea ranks 57th and South Sudan ranks 58th of 160 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Guinea or South Sudan?
- Guinea, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0002 t per person in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Guinea and South Sudan?
- 0 t per person, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and South Sudan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Guinea ranks 57th and South Sudan ranks 58th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.