Czechia vs Lesotho: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per
Czechia
0 t per person
in 2017
Lesotho
0 t per person
in 2024
Czechia rank
105th
Lesotho rank
104th
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time
- Czechia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 105th and Lesotho ranks 104th of 160 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Czechia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Czechia and Lesotho?
- 0 t per person, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Lesotho?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Lesotho rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Czechia ranks 105th and Lesotho ranks 104th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.