Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per

Croatia
0.0002 t per person
in 2017
Guinea-Bissau
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
62nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
65th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per over time

  • Croatia
  • Guinea-Bissau
0000196119922024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.0002 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Croatia ranks 62nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 65th of 160 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0001 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0.0001 t per person Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.0002 t per person 0.0002 t per person 0 t per person Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per, Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
Croatia, at 0.0002 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0001 t per person, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
Croatia ranks 62nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 65th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/croatia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-per-capita/croatia/guinea-bissau/">Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per capita
Unit
t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,090 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.