Romania vs Tunisia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Romania
-5.1 % change on previous year
in 2017
Tunisia
-5.15 % change on previous year
in 2024
Romania rank
146th
Tunisia rank
147th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Romania
  • Tunisia
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Romania currently reports -5.1 % change on previous year against -5.15 % change on previous year in Tunisia, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 147th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 4 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 2.95 % change on previous year 1.79 % change on previous year 1.16 % change on previous year Romania
1970s 3.4 % change on previous year -1.57 % change on previous year 4.97 % change on previous year Romania
1980s 1.69 % change on previous year 6.13 % change on previous year 4.44 % change on previous year Tunisia
1990s -4.43 % change on previous year 5.15 % change on previous year 9.58 % change on previous year Tunisia
2000s 3.34 % change on previous year -0.5879 % change on previous year 3.93 % change on previous year Romania
2010s 1.9 % change on previous year 0.5531 % change on previous year 1.35 % change on previous year Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Romania or Tunisia?
Romania, at -5.1 % change on previous year against -5.15 % change on previous year in Tunisia as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Romania and Tunisia?
0.05 % change on previous year, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tunisia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Romania and Tunisia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Romania ranks 146th and Tunisia ranks 147th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Tunisia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/romania/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/romania/tunisia/">Romania vs Tunisia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,429 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.