New Zealand vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

New Zealand
4.57 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
5.2 % change on previous year
in 2017
New Zealand rank
37th
Sweden rank
35th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sweden
-20-1001020196219932024

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 5.2 % change on previous year against 4.57 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0.63 % change on previous year.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sweden ahead.

New Zealand ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 35th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 2.52 % change on previous year 13.93 % change on previous year 11.41 % change on previous year Sweden
1970s -0.6609 % change on previous year 3.52 % change on previous year 4.18 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 2.03 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year 0.8819 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s -1.59 % change on previous year -3.35 % change on previous year 1.77 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 0.5447 % change on previous year 3.4 % change on previous year 2.85 % change on previous year Sweden
2010s -1.48 % change on previous year 0.5139 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, New Zealand or Sweden?
Sweden, at 5.2 % change on previous year against 4.57 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between New Zealand and Sweden?
0.63 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
New Zealand ranks 37th and Sweden ranks 35th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/new-zealand/sweden/">New Zealand vs Sweden: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,429 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.