Namibia vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Namibia
-4.62 % change on previous year
in 2024
Romania
-5.1 % change on previous year
in 2017
Namibia rank
144th
Romania rank
146th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Namibia
  • Romania
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -4.62 % change on previous year against -5.1 % change on previous year in Romania, a difference of 0.48 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 144th and Romania ranks 146th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 2.71 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year 0.2348 % change on previous year Romania
1970s 3.22 % change on previous year 3.4 % change on previous year 0.1814 % change on previous year Romania
1980s -3.35 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year 5.04 % change on previous year Romania
1990s 19.58 % change on previous year -4.43 % change on previous year 24.01 % change on previous year Namibia
2000s 4.4 % change on previous year 3.34 % change on previous year 1.06 % change on previous year Namibia
2010s -3.88 % change on previous year 1.9 % change on previous year 5.78 % change on previous year Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Namibia or Romania?
Namibia, at -4.62 % change on previous year against -5.1 % change on previous year in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Namibia and Romania?
0.48 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Romania?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Namibia and Romania rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Namibia ranks 144th and Romania ranks 146th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/namibia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/namibia/romania/">Namibia vs Romania: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,429 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.