Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 45.54 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 42.28 % change on previous year.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 14.0 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.5 % change on previous year | 9.85 % change on previous year | 7.36 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 2.58 % change on previous year | -6.72 % change on previous year | 9.3 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1980s | 0.3863 % change on previous year | -0.2404 % change on previous year | 0.6267 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | 4.76 % change on previous year | 0.1435 % change on previous year | 4.61 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | 3.07 % change on previous year | -4.12 % change on previous year | 7.19 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | 0.7672 % change on previous year | 49.16 % change on previous year | 48.4 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.27 % change on previous year | 15.2 % change on previous year | 12.93 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 45.54 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 42.28 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th and Zimbabwe ranks 5th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.