Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Mali: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 35.95 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 32.69 % change on previous year.
That makes Mali's figure about 11.0 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th and Mali ranks 8th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.5 % change on previous year | 6.95 % change on previous year | 4.46 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 1970s | 2.58 % change on previous year | 4.15 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.3863 % change on previous year | -1.44 % change on previous year | 1.83 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | 4.76 % change on previous year | -3.85 % change on previous year | 8.61 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | 3.07 % change on previous year | 5.88 % change on previous year | 2.81 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.7672 % change on previous year | 7.63 % change on previous year | 6.86 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 2020s | 2.27 % change on previous year | 12.1 % change on previous year | 9.83 % change on previous year | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Mali?
- Mali, at 35.95 % change on previous year against 3.26 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Mali?
- 32.69 % change on previous year, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Mali rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th and Mali ranks 8th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.