Cuba vs Mauritius: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Cuba
7.88 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritius
7.23 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cuba rank
26th
Mauritius rank
28th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Cuba
  • Mauritius
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 7.88 % change on previous year against 7.23 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0.65 % change on previous year.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 26 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 26th and Mauritius ranks 28th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 1.87 % change on previous year -3.94 % change on previous year 5.8 % change on previous year Cuba
1970s 2.63 % change on previous year 2.52 % change on previous year 0.1122 % change on previous year Cuba
1980s 26.19 % change on previous year -0.1266 % change on previous year 26.32 % change on previous year Cuba
1990s 0.1824 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year 3.79 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s 7.62 % change on previous year -0.9923 % change on previous year 8.61 % change on previous year Cuba
2010s 2.41 % change on previous year 15.13 % change on previous year 12.72 % change on previous year Mauritius
2020s 4.45 % change on previous year 18.01 % change on previous year 13.57 % change on previous year Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Cuba or Mauritius?
Cuba, at 7.88 % change on previous year against 7.23 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Cuba and Mauritius?
0.65 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Mauritius rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Cuba ranks 26th and Mauritius ranks 28th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Mauritius: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/cuba/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/cuba/mauritius/">Cuba vs Mauritius: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,429 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.