Australia vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Australia
9.53 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Africa
10.16 % change on previous year
in 2024
Australia rank
21st
South Africa rank
19th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Australia
  • South Africa
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 10.16 % change on previous year against 9.53 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 0.63 % change on previous year.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 19th of 194 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 2 % change on previous year 7.27 % change on previous year 5.27 % change on previous year South Africa
1970s -1.67 % change on previous year -2.02 % change on previous year 0.3492 % change on previous year Australia
1980s 1.4 % change on previous year 0.3049 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Australia
1990s 1.67 % change on previous year -0.3226 % change on previous year 1.99 % change on previous year Australia
2000s 0.3355 % change on previous year 4.2 % change on previous year 3.87 % change on previous year South Africa
2010s 1.82 % change on previous year 0.2205 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year Australia
2020s 5.32 % change on previous year 0.7525 % change on previous year 4.57 % change on previous year Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Australia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 10.16 % change on previous year against 9.53 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Australia and South Africa?
0.63 % change on previous year, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Australia ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 19th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/australia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/australia/south-africa/">Australia vs South Africa: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,429 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.