Tunisia vs Uzbekistan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Tunisia
22.79 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
21.88 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia rank
18th
Uzbekistan rank
20th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Tunisia
  • Uzbekistan
1015202530196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 22.79 An per square kilometre against 21.88 An per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.91 An per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Tunisia ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 160 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tunisia Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 22.19 An per square kilometre 10 An per square kilometre 12.19 An per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 26.1 An per square kilometre 9.98 An per square kilometre 16.12 An per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 23.07 An per square kilometre 18.6 An per square kilometre 4.46 An per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 23.56 An per square kilometre 21 An per square kilometre 2.56 An per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Tunisia or Uzbekistan?
Tunisia, at 22.79 An per square kilometre against 21.88 An per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Tunisia and Uzbekistan?
0.91 An per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Uzbekistan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Tunisia ranks 18th and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Uzbekistan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/tunisia/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/tunisia/uzbekistan/">Tunisia vs Uzbekistan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.