New Caledonia vs Thailand: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

New Caledonia
0.0318 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
0.0245 An per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
151st
Thailand rank
154th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Thailand
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0318 An per square kilometre against 0.0245 An per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.0073 An per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.3 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 151st and Thailand ranks 154th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0429 An per square kilometre 0.0119 An per square kilometre 0.0309 An per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 0.0676 An per square kilometre 0.0211 An per square kilometre 0.0465 An per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 0.0622 An per square kilometre 0.038 An per square kilometre 0.0242 An per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 0.0571 An per square kilometre 0.0612 An per square kilometre 0.0041 An per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.0254 An per square kilometre 0.0287 An per square kilometre 0.0033 An per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.0267 An per square kilometre 0.0246 An per square kilometre 0.0021 An per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0318 An per square kilometre 0.0252 An per square kilometre 0.0065 An per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, New Caledonia or Thailand?
New Caledonia, at 0.0318 An per square kilometre against 0.0245 An per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between New Caledonia and Thailand?
0.0073 An per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Thailand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Thailand rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
New Caledonia ranks 151st and Thailand ranks 154th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Thailand: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/new-caledonia/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/new-caledonia/thailand/">New Caledonia vs Thailand: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.