Guatemala vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Guatemala
1.26 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
1.32 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
102nd
Nepal rank
101st

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Guatemala
  • Nepal
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 1.32 An per square kilometre against 1.26 An per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.06 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 102nd and Nepal ranks 101st of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.91 An per square kilometre 1.35 An per square kilometre 0.5535 An per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 1.71 An per square kilometre 1.57 An per square kilometre 0.1369 An per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 1.15 An per square kilometre 1.89 An per square kilometre 0.7429 An per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 0.9898 An per square kilometre 2.3 An per square kilometre 1.31 An per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 1.02 An per square kilometre 2.15 An per square kilometre 1.13 An per square kilometre Nepal
2010s 1.23 An per square kilometre 2.1 An per square kilometre 0.8666 An per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 1.25 An per square kilometre 1.89 An per square kilometre 0.6345 An per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Guatemala or Nepal?
Nepal, at 1.32 An per square kilometre against 1.26 An per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Guatemala and Nepal?
0.06 An per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Nepal rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Guatemala ranks 102nd and Nepal ranks 101st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/guatemala/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/guatemala/nepal/">Guatemala vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.