Cuba vs Gambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Cuba
5.9 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
5.86 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
56th
Gambia rank
57th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Cuba
  • Gambia
0246196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 5.9 An per square kilometre against 5.86 An per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.04 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Cuba ranks 56th and Gambia ranks 57th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Gambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6818 An per square kilometre 2.92 An per square kilometre 2.24 An per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.8939 An per square kilometre 3.57 An per square kilometre 2.68 An per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 1.4 An per square kilometre 4.55 An per square kilometre 3.15 An per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 3.54 An per square kilometre 3.49 An per square kilometre 0.0487 An per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 5.07 An per square kilometre 4.5 An per square kilometre 0.5629 An per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 6.1 An per square kilometre 3.63 An per square kilometre 2.47 An per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 6.22 An per square kilometre 5.98 An per square kilometre 0.2381 An per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cuba or Gambia?
Cuba, at 5.9 An per square kilometre against 5.86 An per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cuba and Gambia?
0.04 An per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Gambia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cuba ranks 56th and Gambia ranks 57th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Gambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/gambia-the/">Cuba vs Gambia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.