Chile vs Latvia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Chile
0.7371 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
0.723 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
113th
Latvia rank
114th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Chile
  • Latvia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.7371 An per square kilometre against 0.723 An per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0141 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 113th and Latvia ranks 114th of 160 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9825 An per square kilometre 0.9434 An per square kilometre 0.0391 An per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.9901 An per square kilometre 0.261 An per square kilometre 0.7291 An per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.8822 An per square kilometre 0.6548 An per square kilometre 0.2274 An per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.737 An per square kilometre 0.7782 An per square kilometre 0.0412 An per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Chile or Latvia?
Chile, at 0.7371 An per square kilometre against 0.723 An per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Chile and Latvia?
0.0141 An per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Chile ranks 113th and Latvia ranks 114th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.