Cameroon vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Cameroon
3.09 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
2.89 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
77th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
79th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Cameroon
  • Trinidad and Tobago
01234196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 3.09 An per square kilometre against 2.89 An per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.2 An per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 79th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 6 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 1.13 An per square kilometre 1.02 An per square kilometre 0.1113 An per square kilometre Cameroon
1970s 1.25 An per square kilometre 1.25 An per square kilometre 0.0073 An per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 1.64 An per square kilometre 1.29 An per square kilometre 0.3531 An per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 2.59 An per square kilometre 0.245 An per square kilometre 2.34 An per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 2.77 An per square kilometre 0.816 An per square kilometre 1.95 An per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 3.04 An per square kilometre 1.81 An per square kilometre 1.23 An per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 3 An per square kilometre 2.97 An per square kilometre 0.0305 An per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cameroon or Trinidad and Tobago?
Cameroon, at 3.09 An per square kilometre against 2.89 An per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cameroon and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.2 An per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cameroon ranks 77th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 79th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cameroon/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cameroon/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cameroon vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.