Bhutan vs Malaysia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Bhutan
0.0983 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0.1041 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
146th
Malaysia rank
145th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Bhutan
  • Malaysia
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.1041 An per square kilometre against 0.0983 An per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0058 An per square kilometre.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.

Bhutan ranks 146th and Malaysia ranks 145th of 160 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0963 An per square kilometre 0.148 An per square kilometre 0.0517 An per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 0.125 An per square kilometre 0.1021 An per square kilometre 0.0229 An per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.2547 An per square kilometre 0.0393 An per square kilometre 0.2154 An per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.4067 An per square kilometre 0.0609 An per square kilometre 0.3458 An per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0933 An per square kilometre 0.0967 An per square kilometre 0.0034 An per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Bhutan or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 0.1041 An per square kilometre against 0.0983 An per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Bhutan and Malaysia?
0.0058 An per square kilometre, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Malaysia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Malaysia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Bhutan ranks 146th and Malaysia ranks 145th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Malaysia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/bhutan/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/bhutan/malaysia/">Bhutan vs Malaysia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.