Belgium vs Cameroon: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Belgium
2.63 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon
3.09 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
80th
Cameroon rank
77th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Belgium
  • Cameroon
2468196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 3.09 An per square kilometre against 2.63 An per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.46 An per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 80th and Cameroon ranks 77th of 160 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Cameroon Difference Ahead
2000s 4.47 An per square kilometre 2.77 An per square kilometre 1.71 An per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 4.25 An per square kilometre 3.04 An per square kilometre 1.22 An per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 3.5 An per square kilometre 3 An per square kilometre 0.492 An per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Belgium or Cameroon?
Cameroon, at 3.09 An per square kilometre against 2.63 An per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Belgium and Cameroon?
0.46 An per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Cameroon?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Cameroon rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Belgium ranks 80th and Cameroon ranks 77th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Cameroon: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/belgium/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/belgium/cameroon/">Belgium vs Cameroon: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.