Barbados vs Kenya: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Barbados
6.08 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
5.93 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
53rd
Kenya rank
55th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Barbados
  • Kenya
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 6.08 An per square kilometre against 5.93 An per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0.15 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 53rd and Kenya ranks 55th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Kenya Difference Ahead
1960s 12.71 An per square kilometre 2.11 An per square kilometre 10.6 An per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 20.44 An per square kilometre 2.11 An per square kilometre 18.33 An per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 23.23 An per square kilometre 2.96 An per square kilometre 20.27 An per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 3.84 An per square kilometre 3.86 An per square kilometre 0.0217 An per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 4.92 An per square kilometre 4.63 An per square kilometre 0.2871 An per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 6.82 An per square kilometre 5.25 An per square kilometre 1.56 An per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 5.65 An per square kilometre 6.36 An per square kilometre 0.7063 An per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Barbados or Kenya?
Barbados, at 6.08 An per square kilometre against 5.93 An per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Barbados and Kenya?
0.15 An per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Kenya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Kenya rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Barbados ranks 53rd and Kenya ranks 55th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Kenya: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/barbados/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/barbados/kenya/">Barbados vs Kenya: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,121 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.