Mauritius vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Mauritius
0.0013 An per person
in 2024
Suriname
0.0015 An per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
143rd
Suriname rank
142nd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Mauritius
  • Suriname
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0015 An per person against 0.0013 An per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0002 An per person.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 143rd and Suriname ranks 142nd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0051 An per person 0.0043 An per person 0.0008 An per person Mauritius
1970s 0.0032 An per person 0.0029 An per person 0.0003 An per person Mauritius
1980s 0.0032 An per person 0.004 An per person 0.0008 An per person Suriname
1990s 0.0036 An per person 0.0064 An per person 0.0028 An per person Suriname
2000s 0.0021 An per person 0.0032 An per person 0.0012 An per person Suriname
2010s 0.0006 An per person 0.002 An per person 0.0014 An per person Suriname
2020s 0.0012 An per person 0.0015 An per person 0.0003 An per person Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Mauritius or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0015 An per person against 0.0013 An per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Mauritius and Suriname?
0.0002 An per person, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Mauritius ranks 143rd and Suriname ranks 142nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/mauritius/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/mauritius/suriname/">Mauritius vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,279 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.