Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Mauritius
0.0013 An per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0013 An per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
143rd
New Caledonia rank
144th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Mauritius
  • New Caledonia
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0013 An per person against 0.0013 An per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 An per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 144th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0051 An per person 0.0084 An per person 0.0033 An per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.0032 An per person 0.0092 An per person 0.006 An per person New Caledonia
1980s 0.0032 An per person 0.0072 An per person 0.004 An per person New Caledonia
1990s 0.0036 An per person 0.0055 An per person 0.0018 An per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0021 An per person 0.0019 An per person 0.0001 An per person Mauritius
2010s 0.0006 An per person 0.0018 An per person 0.0011 An per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0012 An per person 0.0019 An per person 0.0007 An per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Mauritius or New Caledonia?
Mauritius, at 0.0013 An per person against 0.0013 An per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Mauritius and New Caledonia?
0 An per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Mauritius ranks 143rd and New Caledonia ranks 144th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/mauritius/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/mauritius/new-caledonia/">Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,279 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.