Madagascar vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Madagascar
0.0024 An per person
in 2024
Suriname
0.0015 An per person
in 2024
Madagascar rank
139th
Suriname rank
142nd

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Madagascar
  • Suriname
00.010.020.03196119922024

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0.0024 An per person against 0.0015 An per person in Suriname, a difference of 0.0009 An per person.

That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.7 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 139th and Suriname ranks 142nd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0215 An per person 0.0043 An per person 0.0171 An per person Madagascar
1970s 0.0242 An per person 0.0029 An per person 0.0213 An per person Madagascar
1980s 0.0177 An per person 0.004 An per person 0.0137 An per person Madagascar
1990s 0.006 An per person 0.0064 An per person 0.0003 An per person Suriname
2000s 0.0035 An per person 0.0032 An per person 0.0003 An per person Madagascar
2010s 0.0029 An per person 0.002 An per person 0.0009 An per person Madagascar
2020s 0.0026 An per person 0.0015 An per person 0.0011 An per person Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Madagascar or Suriname?
Madagascar, at 0.0024 An per person against 0.0015 An per person in Suriname as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Madagascar and Suriname?
0.0009 An per person, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Suriname?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Suriname rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Madagascar ranks 139th and Suriname ranks 142nd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/madagascar/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/madagascar/suriname/">Madagascar vs Suriname: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,279 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.