Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Kazakhstan
0.3171 An per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.3042 An per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
19th
Sudan rank
21st
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.3171 An per person against 0.3042 An per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.0129 An per person.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 21st of 160 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4031 An per person | 0.3779 An per person | 0.0252 An per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.3339 An per person | 0.3109 An per person | 0.023 An per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.3171 An per person against 0.3042 An per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 0.0129 An per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Kazakhstan ranks 19th and Sudan ranks 21st of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.