Hungary vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Hungary
0.0083 An per person
in 2024
Nepal
0.008 An per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
115th
Nepal rank
116th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Hungary
  • Nepal
00.020.040.06196119922024

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0083 An per person against 0.008 An per person in Nepal, a difference of 0.0003 An per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 115th and Nepal ranks 116th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0583 An per person 0.0173 An per person 0.0411 An per person Hungary
1970s 0.0337 An per person 0.0164 An per person 0.0173 An per person Hungary
1980s 0.0312 An per person 0.0156 An per person 0.0156 An per person Hungary
1990s 0.023 An per person 0.0151 An per person 0.0079 An per person Hungary
2000s 0.0109 An per person 0.0119 An per person 0.001 An per person Nepal
2010s 0.0068 An per person 0.0108 An per person 0.0041 An per person Nepal
2020s 0.0074 An per person 0.009 An per person 0.0016 An per person Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Hungary or Nepal?
Hungary, at 0.0083 An per person against 0.008 An per person in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Hungary and Nepal?
0.0003 An per person, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nepal?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Hungary and Nepal rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Hungary ranks 115th and Nepal ranks 116th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/hungary/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/hungary/nepal/">Hungary vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,279 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.