Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Chile
0.0237 An per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.023 An per person
in 2024
Chile rank
86th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
88th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Chile
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.050.10.15196119922024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0237 An per person against 0.023 An per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0007 An per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 86th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1285 An per person 0.0803 An per person 0.0482 An per person Chile
1970s 0.0958 An per person 0.0941 An per person 0.0017 An per person Chile
1980s 0.0688 An per person 0.0997 An per person 0.0309 An per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0533 An per person 0.0906 An per person 0.0373 An per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0453 An per person 0.0421 An per person 0.0032 An per person Chile
2010s 0.0364 An per person 0.0166 An per person 0.0198 An per person Chile
2020s 0.0272 An per person 0.0218 An per person 0.0054 An per person Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Chile or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Chile, at 0.0237 An per person against 0.023 An per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0007 An per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chile and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Chile ranks 86th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 88th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/chile/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/chile/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Chile vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 9,279 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.