New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

New Caledonia
-35.8 % change on previous year
in 2024
North Macedonia
-35.28 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
191st
North Macedonia rank
190th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • New Caledonia
  • North Macedonia
-50050100196219932024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports -35.28 % change on previous year against -35.8 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.52 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 191st and North Macedonia ranks 190th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s -3.72 % change on previous year -12.71 % change on previous year 8.98 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s -0.3145 % change on previous year 3.77 % change on previous year 4.08 % change on previous year North Macedonia
2010s 11.05 % change on previous year -4.48 % change on previous year 15.53 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2020s -11.35 % change on previous year -3.17 % change on previous year 8.18 % change on previous year North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, New Caledonia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at -35.28 % change on previous year against -35.8 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
0.52 % change on previous year, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
New Caledonia ranks 191st and North Macedonia ranks 190th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/new-caledonia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/new-caledonia/north-macedonia/">New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.