Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Nepal: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 26.22 % change on previous year against 0.1707 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 26.05 % change on previous year.
That makes Nepal's figure about 153.6 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Nepal ranks 7th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.4 % change on previous year | 1.76 % change on previous year | 0.6335 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 2.43 % change on previous year | 1.49 % change on previous year | 0.9426 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.34 % change on previous year | 3.44 % change on previous year | 2.1 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 1990s | 3.79 % change on previous year | -0.375 % change on previous year | 4.17 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.68 % change on previous year | -0.6087 % change on previous year | 3.29 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.69 % change on previous year | -0.0096 % change on previous year | 1.7 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.79 % change on previous year | -2.41 % change on previous year | 4.21 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 26.22 % change on previous year against 0.1707 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nepal?
- 26.05 % change on previous year, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Nepal rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Nepal ranks 7th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.