Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Mali: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 18.74 % change on previous year against 0.1707 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 18.57 % change on previous year.
That makes Mali's figure about 109.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 25 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Mali ranks 8th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Mali in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.4 % change on previous year | 6.95 % change on previous year | 4.56 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 1970s | 2.43 % change on previous year | 1.98 % change on previous year | 0.4537 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 1.34 % change on previous year | -0.4814 % change on previous year | 1.82 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 3.79 % change on previous year | -4.11 % change on previous year | 7.9 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.68 % change on previous year | 4.67 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 2010s | 1.69 % change on previous year | 7.68 % change on previous year | 5.98 % change on previous year | Mali |
| 2020s | 1.79 % change on previous year | 5.71 % change on previous year | 3.92 % change on previous year | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Mali?
- Mali, at 18.74 % change on previous year against 0.1707 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mali?
- 18.57 % change on previous year, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Mali rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th and Mali ranks 8th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.