Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Poland: Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 12.41 % change on previous year against -0.4713 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 12.88 % change on previous year.
That makes Poland's figure about 26.3 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 11th and Poland ranks 12th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 4 and Poland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.43 % change on previous year | -2.98 % change on previous year | 5.41 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1970s | 2.18 % change on previous year | 0.0156 % change on previous year | 2.16 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1980s | 0.5761 % change on previous year | 3.67 % change on previous year | 3.09 % change on previous year | Poland |
| 1990s | 3.33 % change on previous year | -20.34 % change on previous year | 23.66 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | 2.97 % change on previous year | 5.94 % change on previous year | 2.98 % change on previous year | Poland |
| 2010s | 1.25 % change on previous year | 0.697 % change on previous year | 0.5515 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.49 % change on previous year | 4.92 % change on previous year | 3.43 % change on previous year | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Poland?
- Poland, at 12.41 % change on previous year against -0.4713 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland?
- 12.88 % change on previous year, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Poland rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 11th and Poland ranks 12th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.