Fiji vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Fiji
13.28 % change on previous year
in 2024
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
-0.4713 % change on previous year
in 2024
Fiji rank
11th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
11th

Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Fiji
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
-200204060196219932024

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 13.28 % change on previous year against -0.4713 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 13.75 % change on previous year.

That makes Fiji's figure about 28.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 11th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 11th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 13.13 % change on previous year 7.11 % change on previous year 6.02 % change on previous year Fiji
2000s 1.52 % change on previous year 2.97 % change on previous year 1.45 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 15.29 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year 14.04 % change on previous year Fiji
2020s 11.24 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year 9.74 % change on previous year Fiji

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Fiji or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Fiji, at 13.28 % change on previous year against -0.4713 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Fiji and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
13.75 % change on previous year, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Fiji and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Fiji ranks 11th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 11th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/fiji/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-sheep-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth/fiji/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Fiji vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of sheep, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.